OpenRank

Build auditable, action-ready reputation and ranking into apps with OpenRank.
Rating
Your vote:
Visit Website
docs.openrank.com
Loading
Info updated on:

Start by deciding what “trust” means in your product, then turn it into data you can score. With OpenRank, you configure identities (wallets, usernames, emails, repo handles) and plug in the sources you care about—PRs merged, forum replies, fulfillment rates, verified attestations. Next, create a rule set: weights, caps, decay, and aggregation logic. Run the job and you receive signed results you can cache, stream to a feed, or check on the client before using them to sort content, gate features, or set spending limits. Because every input is referenced, anyone can inspect how a number was produced.

For editorial and community teams, build curation that reflects your values without hand-tuning every list. Map reviewer actions (approve, flag, endorse), quality signals (read time, citations, response quality), and contributor history into a single scorecard. Use it to auto-prioritize moderation queues, spotlight newcomers who meet clear milestones, or throttle visibility for low-confidence posts until more feedback arrives. Publish your rubric so creators know what to improve, and enable appeals by re-running the same recipe on updated evidence.

Developers can integrate in hours: subscribe to webhooks for new attestations, pull historical snapshots over an API, and push custom evaluators that emit their own signed statements (for example, test coverage over time or response SLA compliance). Stitch multiple evaluators into one pipeline and schedule it to run in real time or in batches. Store outputs on your preferred backend and use a tiny verifier in the browser or mobile app to check signatures before acting on a score. Simulate different weightings in a staging environment to understand side effects before rollout.

Use OpenRank to allocate budget and attention where it matters. In marketplaces, rank sellers by delivery reliability and dispute resolution quality, not just volume. In grants and governance, filter proposals by proven track records and let voting power reflect demonstrated contribution instead of raw tokens or loud voices. For growth, unlock feature access when users hit contribution thresholds, and reduce fraud by requiring diverse evidence from independent sources. Every score comes with an audit trail you can export to analytics, and privacy-preserving options let you prove you exceed a threshold without revealing every input.

Review summary

Features

  • Identity linking across wallets, usernames, and service accounts
  • Pluggable data connectors for repos, forums, marketplaces, and attestations
  • Rule-based scoring with weights, caps, decay, and aggregation
  • Signed outputs and lightweight, client-side verification
  • Real-time streaming and scheduled batch pipelines
  • Transparent references and exportable audit trails
  • Privacy-preserving threshold proofs and selective disclosure
  • Webhooks, APIs, and SDKs for quick integration
  • Simulation tools for testing scoring changes safely
  • Composable evaluators you can extend with custom logic

How It’s Used

  • Rank content feeds with transparent criteria and adjustable weights
  • Prioritize moderation and reduce review backlogs automatically
  • Onboard community members with milestone-based unlocks
  • Score developer contributions for bounties and promotion
  • Select grants using evidence-backed reputations and outcomes
  • Weight votes by demonstrated participation, not just holdings
  • Sort marketplace sellers by reliability and dispute handling
  • Gate access to premium features based on trustworthy activity
  • Reduce multi-account abuse with diverse, independent evidence
  • Power recommendation systems that explain why items are shown

Comments

User

Your vote: